San Antonio Spurs vs Memphis Grizzlies Match Player Stats

The latest San Antonio Spurs vs Memphis Grizzlies match player stats show a one-sided 123-98 San Antonio victory on March 25, 2026. Victor Wembanyama delivered 19 points, 15 rebounds, three assists, three steals, and seven blocks in only 26 minutes. Devin Vassell also scored 19, Stephon Castle added 15 points and nine assists, and seven Spurs reached double figures. GG Jackson II led Memphis with 20 points, but the Grizzlies could not overcome San Antonio’s interior scoring, rebounding, and defensive size. 

San Antonio Spurs vs Memphis Grizzlies Match Player Stats at a Glance

San Antonio established a 19-point lead in the opening quarter, briefly allowed Memphis to respond before halftime, and then ended the contest with a dominant 41-20 third quarter. The victory was the Spurs’ seventh in a row and improved their record to 55-18, while Memphis fell to 24-48. 

Game detail	Result
Date	March 25, 2026
Venue	FedExForum, Memphis
Final score	Spurs 123, Grizzlies 98
First quarter	Spurs 38-19
Halftime	Spurs 57-44
Third-quarter score	Spurs 41-20
Score entering fourth	Spurs 98-64
Spurs record after game	55-18
Grizzlies record after game	24-48

The final margin was 25 points, but the game was effectively decided much earlier. San Antonio opened with an alley-oop to Wembanyama, moved ahead 22-4, and never surrendered control. 

Key San Antonio Spurs Player Statistics

San Antonio did not depend on one high-volume scorer. Its starting lineup produced efficient, balanced offense, while Keldon Johnson and Harrison Barnes supplied another 26 points from the bench.

Spurs player	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	FG
Victor Wembanyama	19	15	3	3	7	8-15
Devin Vassell	19	7	4	1	0	7-10
Stephon Castle	15	3	9	0	0	5-7
Keldon Johnson	15	7	3	0	0	7-16
Julian Champagnie	13	8	2	1	1	4-10
Harrison Barnes	11	2	2	0	0	4-7
Dylan Harper	10	5	6	0	1	4-8

Wembanyama and Vassell tied for the team scoring lead, but their influence came in different forms. Wembanyama controlled the rim and the glass, while Vassell supplied highly efficient perimeter scoring. Castle and Harper combined for 15 assists, helping San Antonio finish with 36 as a team. 

Vassell recorded the best plus-minus of the game at plus-38. Wembanyama and Castle each finished at plus-34, while Champagnie posted plus-28. Those figures reflect how thoroughly San Antonio’s main rotation controlled the competitive portion of the game. 

Key Memphis Grizzlies Player Statistics

Memphis received respectable individual production from several young players, but its offense lacked efficiency inside the arc and struggled against San Antonio’s length.

Grizzlies player	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	FG
GG Jackson II	20	7	2	2	1	7-15
Olivier-Maxence Prosper	17	5	0	0	0	6-10
DeJon Jarreau	15	2	1	3	0	5-15
Cedric Coward	12	1	4	0	0	5-10
Walter Clayton Jr.	10	2	6	0	1	3-8
Javon Small	8	3	5	1	0	2-4
Taylor Hendricks	2	8	0	0	0	1-7

Jackson was Memphis’s clearest offensive bright spot. He scored 20 points on 7-of-15 shooting, made three three-pointers, grabbed seven rebounds, and committed no turnovers. Prosper added 17 points on an efficient 6-of-10 performance. 

Jarreau reached 15 points, but he needed 15 field-goal attempts and made only two of his 11 three-point shots. Clayton provided six assists, and Cam Spencer recorded seven, although Spencer went scoreless from the field on six attempts. 

Quarter-by-Quarter Match Recap

First quarter: San Antonio takes immediate control

The Spurs set the tone with their first possession, using a lob for Wembanyama. After Memphis briefly tied the score at 2-2, San Antonio’s spacing and transition play took over.

Vassell hit an early three, Dylan Harper scored from outside, Champagnie made consecutive three-pointers, and Wembanyama repeatedly turned defensive stops into transition opportunities. A Castle dunk after a Wembanyama steal completed an 18-2 run and pushed the score to 22-4. 

San Antonio finished the period ahead 38-19. The Spurs were creating open shots with rapid passing, while Memphis was frequently forced into contested attempts away from the basket.

Second quarter: Memphis briefly stabilizes

The Grizzlies produced their strongest defensive stretch before halftime. They won the second quarter 25-19 and prevented San Antonio from turning the contest into a complete blowout before the break.

Even so, the Spurs retained a 57-44 advantage. Memphis had reduced the pace of the game, but it had not solved the underlying problems. San Antonio still held the rebounding advantage, Wembanyama remained a barrier around the rim, and the Grizzlies lacked a reliable interior scoring option. 

Third quarter: the decisive San Antonio run

Any possibility of a comeback disappeared after halftime.

The Spurs repeatedly used Wembanyama’s size in screening actions, rolls, seals, and offensive-rebounding situations. San Antonio scored 41 points in the quarter while holding Memphis to 20.

Wembanyama closed the period with a three-pointer, giving the Spurs a 98-64 lead. San Antonio had doubled its halftime advantage from 13 to 34 points in only 12 minutes.

Fourth quarter: reserves complete the game

Memphis won the fourth quarter 34-25, but the competitive phase had already ended. Both teams expanded their rotations, and several reserve players received extended minutes.

The late scoring allowed Memphis to reduce what had been an even larger deficit, but San Antonio still completed a comfortable 123-98 victory.

How the Spurs Created a 25-Point Margin

Team statistic	Spurs	Grizzlies
Field goals	46-89	34-86
Field-goal percentage	51.7%	39.5%
Three-pointers	16-46	16-50
Free throws	15-22	14-20
Player rebounds	59	33
Offensive rebounds	13	3
Assists	36	26
Blocks	9	3
Turnovers	14	12
Points in the paint	56	34

San Antonio did not win because it made more three-pointers. Both teams converted exactly 16 shots from beyond the arc. The difference was everything that happened closer to the basket. 

Identical three-point totals, completely different two-point production

The Spurs made 46 total field goals, including 16 threes. That means they converted 30 two-point shots.

Memphis also made 16 threes, but only 34 total field goals. The Grizzlies therefore made 18 two-pointers.

San Antonio gained 24 points through two-point field goals and one additional point at the free-throw line. That combination accounts for the exact 25-point final margin.

This is the clearest explanation of the result. Three-point shooting was nearly even. Interior and mid-range efficiency were not.

San Antonio controlled the paint

The Spurs outscored Memphis 56-34 in the paint. Their 22-point paint advantage closely mirrors the 24-point difference in two-point scoring.

Wembanyama created direct baskets as a roller and finisher, but he also changed Memphis’s defensive positioning. Help defenders had to remain close to him, opening passing lanes and catch-and-shoot opportunities for Vassell, Champagnie, Harper, and Barnes.

At the opposite end, Memphis had no equivalent interior pressure. The Grizzlies often settled for threes because driving lanes disappeared around Wembanyama.

The rebounding difference ended Memphis possessions

San Antonio’s players collected 59 rebounds compared with Memphis’s 33. The Spurs also held a 13-3 advantage on the offensive glass. 

That mattered on both sides. Defensive rebounds allowed San Antonio to run before the Grizzlies could organize. Offensive rebounds gave the Spurs additional chances after the relatively small number of shots they missed.

Memphis was already shooting only 39.5%. Recovering just three offensive rebounds made those misses even more damaging.

Ball movement produced high-quality attempts

The Spurs recorded 36 assists on 46 field goals. In other words, approximately 78.3% of their made baskets were assisted.

Castle led the team with nine assists, Harper added six, Vassell contributed four, and four more Spurs recorded at least two. San Antonio consistently moved the ball one pass beyond the first available shot. 

The best example was not an individual isolation. It was the sequence of drives, kick-outs, extra passes, and relocations that repeatedly forced Memphis to defend multiple actions in one possession.

Victor Wembanyama’s Impact Went Beyond 19 Points

A 19-point performance may appear modest for a franchise star, but Wembanyama dominated the most important areas of the game.

He finished with:

• 19 points
• 15 rebounds
• Seven blocks
• Three steals
• Three assists
• Six offensive rebounds
• An 8-of-15 shooting line
• A plus-34 rating in 26 minutes

Wembanyama directly recorded 10 defensive events through blocks and steals. His seven blocks were more than double Memphis’s team total of three. 

The official box score still understates his influence. Memphis players changed release angles, abandoned drives, and moved into lower-percentage pull-up shots when he occupied the paint. His defensive presence helped explain why the Grizzlies attempted 50 three-pointers but only 36 shots from inside the arc.

His offensive rebounding was equally significant. Six of his 15 rebounds came at the offensive end, matching twice Memphis’s entire team total of three.

Vassell and Castle Supplied Efficient Perimeter Control

Devin Vassell may have produced San Antonio’s cleanest offensive performance.

He scored 19 points on 7-of-10 shooting, made four of six three-pointers, collected seven rebounds, handed out four assists, and committed no turnovers. His plus-38 rating was the highest among all players. 

Vassell punished defenders whenever Memphis sent additional attention toward Wembanyama. He did not need prolonged isolation possessions; he scored through quick decisions, accurate shooting, and timely movement.

Castle influenced the game as the primary organizer. He contributed 15 points and nine assists while making five of seven field-goal attempts. His five turnovers were the main weakness in his line, but the overall offensive result remained strongly positive.

Harper complemented Castle with 10 points, five rebounds, and six assists. Together, the two young guards gave San Antonio 25 points and 15 assists.

San Antonio’s Supporting Cast Prevented Defensive Overloading

The Spurs had seven double-digit scorers. That balance made it difficult for Memphis to concentrate on Wembanyama or Vassell.

Champagnie added 13 points and eight rebounds, including three made threes. Johnson delivered 15 points and seven rebounds off the bench. Barnes scored 11 and converted three of six shots from outside. 

Even Kelly Olynyk contributed nine points and three assists in eight minutes. He made both of his field-goal attempts and all four free throws.

This depth explains why San Antonio maintained its offensive rhythm despite De’Aaron Fox missing the game with back soreness. Luke Kornet was also unavailable because of injury management.

What Memphis Can Take from the Player Stats

The loss was decisive, but several Memphis players produced useful developmental minutes.

Jackson combined scoring efficiency with ball security. His 20 points came without a turnover, and he competed against a much larger San Antonio frontcourt.

Prosper also gave Memphis efficient production. He scored 17 points, made six of 10 shots, and connected on three three-pointers.

Coward finished with 12 points and four assists without committing a turnover. Clayton’s six assists suggested that he could create opportunities even when his own shot was inconsistent.

The larger concern was shot distribution. Memphis attempted 50 threes and made 16. That 32% conversion rate was not disastrous by itself, but the team generated too little at the rim to balance those attempts.

Injuries and Lineup Context

Memphis entered the matchup severely depleted. Ten players did not dress, and Ja Morant, Zach Edey, and Brandon Clarke had already been ruled out for the remainder of the season after medical procedures. The tallest Memphis starter was listed at 6-foot-9, creating a major physical disadvantage against the 7-foot-4 Wembanyama. 

That context does not remove the value of San Antonio’s performance. The Spurs still had to execute, avoid complacency, and take advantage of the mismatch. They did all three.

It does, however, explain why Memphis had difficulty protecting the basket, finishing defensive possessions, and creating efficient interior offense.

Spurs vs Grizzlies 2025-26 Season Series

San Antonio won three of the four regular-season meetings:

Date	Result
November 18, 2025	Spurs 111, Grizzlies 101
December 2, 2025	Spurs 126, Grizzlies 119
January 6, 2026	Grizzlies 106, Spurs 105
March 25, 2026	Spurs 123, Grizzlies 98

The January meeting was the only Memphis victory, with Cam Spencer scoring the final five Grizzlies points in a one-point win. San Antonio responded in March with the most decisive result of the four-game series. 

What the Box Score Really Says

The central lesson is not simply that San Antonio shot better.

The Spurs won because their advantages reinforced one another:

• Wembanyama discouraged interior attempts.
• Memphis responded by taking 50 three-pointers.
• Missed shots created rebound opportunities.
• San Antonio controlled the glass.
• Defensive rebounds started transition attacks.
• Transition pressure generated paint finishes and open threes.
• Ball movement prevented Memphis from loading its defense toward one scorer.

The result was a complete two-way performance. San Antonio did not require a 30-point scorer because several players made efficient contributions within a connected system.

Conclusion

San Antonio’s 123-98 victory was built on much more than Wembanyama’s headline numbers. The Spurs and Grizzlies each made 16 three-pointers. San Antonio separated itself by making 12 more two-point baskets, controlling the paint 56-34, winning the player-rebound battle 59-33, and producing 36 assists.

Wembanyama controlled the rim, Vassell supplied efficient shooting, Castle organized the offense, and the supporting cast prevented Memphis from focusing on any one option. Memphis found promising production from Jackson and Prosper, but its depleted lineup could not match San Antonio’s size, depth, or interior efficiency. The final score accurately reflected the game: San Antonio controlled the opening minutes, survived Memphis’s brief second-quarter response, and ended the contest with a decisive third-quarter surge.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who won the Spurs vs Grizzlies game on March 25, 2026?

The San Antonio Spurs defeated the Memphis Grizzlies 123-98 at FedExForum. San Antonio led 38-19 after the first quarter and entered the fourth with a 98-64 advantage. 

Who scored the most points for the Spurs?

Victor Wembanyama and Devin Vassell tied for the Spurs lead with 19 points each. Vassell shot 7-of-10, while Wembanyama added 15 rebounds and seven blocks. 

Who was the Grizzlies’ leading scorer?

GG Jackson II led Memphis with 20 points. He shot 7-of-15 from the field, made three three-pointers, and recorded seven rebounds, two assists, two steals, and one block.

What were Victor Wembanyama’s complete stats?

Wembanyama recorded 19 points, 15 rebounds, three assists, three steals, and seven blocks. He made eight of 15 field-goal attempts and finished with a plus-34 rating in 26 minutes. 

What was the biggest statistical difference between the teams?

Interior production and rebounding created the clearest separation. San Antonio won the player-rebound count 59-33 and points in the paint 56-34. The Spurs also made 12 more two-point field goals. 

How many three-pointers did each team make?

Both teams made 16 three-pointers. San Antonio attempted 46 and Memphis attempted 50. The final margin came from San Antonio’s two-point scoring and slight free-throw advantage rather than a difference in made threes. 

Which Spurs player had the most assists?

Stephon Castle led San Antonio with nine assists. Dylan Harper finished with six, while Devin Vassell added four. The Spurs recorded 36 assists as a team. 

Where can the official San Antonio Spurs vs Memphis Grizzlies match player stats be verified?

The official NBA box score includes the complete player totals, game charts, play-by-play, and scoring information. ESPN, CBS Sports, FOX Sports, and Basketball-Reference also publish box-score versions of the matchup.